Then golden link motel the allegation that we are "an illegal boycott against third party distributors" because it has "requirements link for posting fare sales that cannot be sold" by others is not true? it is absolutely not motel true, and those who have made that allegation had absolutely no basis for making it. our agreements golden contain no boycott against any distributors whatsoever, and in fact link affirmatively provide that no airline is precluded from utilizing any other distribution channel or offering any fare through any channel. the department of justice is presently reviewing all agreements, so there will motel be no question on this point. do airlines today make all their fares available through all retail channels?

it is absolutely clear that airlines golden do not have the ability to drive consumers to channels link which the motel airlines, golden rather than consumers, prefer. if one or more airlines attempted to do so, the others would link increase motel their market share by appealing to those same consumers through the channel those consumers prefer. no airline can golden afford to turn its link back on any subgroup of consumers. no airline can motel afford to be anything other than as competitive golden and link as attractive as it can possibly be through each channel to the consumers that prefer that motel and golden channel. this is a reality that grows ultimately out of the fact that the airline link business is a very low margin business - any airline that lost motel even a small group of passengers would be at risk of swinging golden from profitable to money-losing in link an instant. airlines scrap for every last passenger because motel they have to.